Home / Processors / Compare

i3-12100F vs i7-13700K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i3-12100F (2022) and the Intel Core i7-13700K (2022).

i3-12100F

Intel Entry-level

62 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (58 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($97 vs $409)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i7-13700K

Intel High-end

84 / perf index
  • ~35% faster on average
  • More cores (16 vs 4)
  • Larger L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.4 vs 4.3 GHz)
  • Has integrated graphics

Check price →

Verdict: The i7-13700K is roughly 35% faster than the i3-12100F on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

At launch pricing, the i3-12100F offers more performance per dollar, and the i3-12100F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i3-12100F
62
i7-13700K
84

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi3-12100Fi7-13700K
FamilyAlder LakeRaptor Lake
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Release year20222022
Est. gaming perf.
62
84
Est. multi-core perf.
20
72
Est. single-core perf.
70
89
Cores
4
16
Threads
8
24
Max boost clock
4.3 GHz
5.4 GHz
L3 cache
12 MB
30 MB
TDP (base)
58 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 770
Launch MSRP
$97
$409

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i7-13700K better than the i3-12100F?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i7-13700K is about 35% faster than the i3-12100F on average.

How much faster is the i7-13700K than the i3-12100F?

Roughly 35% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i3-12100F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons