Home / Processors / Compare

i3-12100F vs i9-12900K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i3-12100F (2022) and the Intel Core i9-12900K (2021).

i3-12100F

Intel Entry-level

62 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (58 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($97 vs $589)
  • Newer (2022 vs 2021)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i9-12900K

Intel Mid-range

78 / perf index
  • ~26% faster on average
  • More cores (16 vs 4)
  • Larger L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.2 vs 4.3 GHz)
  • Has integrated graphics

Check price →

Verdict: The i9-12900K is roughly 26% faster than the i3-12100F on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

At launch pricing, the i3-12100F offers more performance per dollar, and the i3-12100F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i3-12100F
62
i9-12900K
78

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi3-12100Fi9-12900K
FamilyAlder LakeAlder Lake
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Release year20222021
Est. gaming perf.
62
78
Est. multi-core perf.
20
63
Est. single-core perf.
70
85
Cores
4
16
Threads
8
24
Max boost clock
4.3 GHz
5.2 GHz
L3 cache
12 MB
30 MB
TDP (base)
58 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 770
Launch MSRP
$97
$589

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i9-12900K better than the i3-12100F?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i9-12900K is about 26% faster than the i3-12100F on average.

How much faster is the i9-12900K than the i3-12100F?

Roughly 26% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i3-12100F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons