Home / Processors / Compare

i3-13100F vs i5-13400F

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i3-13100F (2023) and the Intel Core i5-13400F (2023).

i3-13100F

Intel Entry-level

65 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (58 W vs 65 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($109 vs $196)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i5-13400F

Intel Mid-range

73 / perf index
  • ~12% faster on average
  • More cores (10 vs 4)
  • Larger L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (4.6 vs 4.5 GHz)
  • More power-efficient

Check price →

Verdict: The i5-13400F is around 12% faster than the i3-13100F on average — a modest edge you may notice in demanding titles, but not a generational leap.

At launch pricing, the i3-13100F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-13400F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i3-13100F
65
i5-13400F
73

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi3-13100Fi5-13400F
FamilyRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Release year20232023
Est. gaming perf.
65
73
Est. multi-core perf.
21
35
Est. single-core perf.
72
74
Cores
4
10
Threads
8
16
Max boost clock
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
L3 cache
12 MB
20 MB
TDP (base)
58 W
65 W
Integrated graphicsNoneNone
Launch MSRP
$109
$196

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i5-13400F better than the i3-13100F?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-13400F is about 12% faster than the i3-13100F on average.

How much faster is the i5-13400F than the i3-13100F?

Roughly 12% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i3-13100F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons