Home / Processors / Compare

i3-13100F vs i9-13900K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i3-13100F (2023) and the Intel Core i9-13900K (2022).

i3-13100F

Intel Entry-level

65 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (58 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($109 vs $589)
  • Newer (2023 vs 2022)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i9-13900K

Intel Enthusiast

86 / perf index
  • ~32% faster on average
  • More cores (24 vs 4)
  • Larger L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.8 vs 4.5 GHz)
  • Has integrated graphics

Check price →

Verdict: The i9-13900K is roughly 32% faster than the i3-13100F on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

At launch pricing, the i3-13100F offers more performance per dollar, and the i3-13100F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i3-13100F
65
i9-13900K
86

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi3-13100Fi9-13900K
FamilyRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Release year20232022
Est. gaming perf.
65
86
Est. multi-core perf.
21
93
Est. single-core perf.
72
96
Cores
4
24
Threads
8
32
Max boost clock
4.5 GHz
5.8 GHz
L3 cache
12 MB
36 MB
TDP (base)
58 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 770
Launch MSRP
$109
$589

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i9-13900K better than the i3-13100F?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i9-13900K is about 32% faster than the i3-13100F on average.

How much faster is the i9-13900K than the i3-13100F?

Roughly 32% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i3-13100F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons