Home / Processors / Compare

i3-14100F vs i5-14400

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i3-14100F (2024) and the Intel Core i5-14400 (2024).

i3-14100F

Intel Mid-range

68 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (58 W vs 65 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($134 vs $221)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i5-14400

Intel Mid-range

75 / perf index
  • ~10% faster on average
  • More cores (10 vs 4)
  • Larger L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB)
  • Has integrated graphics

Check price →

Verdict: The i5-14400 is around 10% faster than the i3-14100F on average — a modest edge you may notice in demanding titles, but not a generational leap.

At launch pricing, the i3-14100F offers more performance per dollar, and the i3-14100F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i3-14100F
68
i5-14400
75

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi3-14100Fi5-14400
FamilyRaptor Lake RefreshRaptor Lake Refresh
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Release year20242024
Est. gaming perf.
68
75
Est. multi-core perf.
22
36
Est. single-core perf.
74
77
Cores
4
10
Threads
8
16
Max boost clock
4.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
L3 cache
12 MB
20 MB
TDP (base)
58 W
65 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 730
Launch MSRP
$134
$221

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i5-14400 better than the i3-14100F?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-14400 is about 10% faster than the i3-14100F on average.

How much faster is the i5-14400 than the i3-14100F?

Roughly 10% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i3-14100F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons