Home / Processors / Compare

i3-14100F vs i5-8400

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i3-14100F (2024) and the Intel Core i5-8400 (2017).

Winner

i3-14100F

Intel Mid-range

68 / perf index
  • ~45% faster on average
  • Larger L3 cache (12 MB vs 9 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (4.7 vs 4.0 GHz)
  • Lower power draw (58 W vs 65 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($134 vs $182)

Check price →

i5-8400

Intel Entry-level

47 / perf index
  • More cores (6 vs 4)
  • Has integrated graphics

Check price →

Verdict: The i3-14100F is roughly 45% faster than the i5-8400 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs LGA1151), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.

At launch pricing, the i3-14100F offers more performance per dollar, and the i3-14100F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i3-14100F
68
i5-8400
47

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi3-14100Fi5-8400
FamilyRaptor Lake RefreshCoffee Lake
SocketLGA1700LGA1151
Release year20242017
Est. gaming perf.
68
47
Est. multi-core perf.
22
14
Est. single-core perf.
74
45
Cores
4
6
Threads
8
6
Max boost clock
4.7 GHz
4.0 GHz
L3 cache
12 MB
9 MB
TDP (base)
58 W
65 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 630
Launch MSRP
$134
$182

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i3-14100F better than the i5-8400?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i3-14100F is about 45% faster than the i5-8400 on average.

How much faster is the i3-14100F than the i5-8400?

Roughly 45% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i3-14100F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons