i3-14100F vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i3-14100F (2024) and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (2019).
i3-14100F
Intel Mid-range
- ✓ ~17% faster on average
- ✓ Higher boost clock (4.7 vs 4.6 GHz)
- ✓ Lower power draw (58 W vs 105 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($134 vs $499)
- ✓ Newer (2024 vs 2019)
Verdict: The i3-14100F is roughly 17% faster than the Ryzen 9 3900X on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
For gaming the i3-14100F leads, but the Ryzen 9 3900X pulls ahead in heavily multi-threaded work like rendering, compiling and video export thanks to its stronger multi-core throughput.
Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs AM4), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.
At launch pricing, the i3-14100F offers more performance per dollar, and the i3-14100F is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | i3-14100F | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Raptor Lake Refresh | Zen 2 |
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| Release year | 2024 | 2019 |
| Est. gaming perf. | ||
| Est. multi-core perf. | ||
| Est. single-core perf. | ||
| Cores | ||
| Threads | ||
| Max boost clock | ||
| L3 cache | ||
| TDP (base) | ||
| Integrated graphics | None | None |
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the i3-14100F better than the Ryzen 9 3900X?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i3-14100F is about 17% faster than the Ryzen 9 3900X on average.
How much faster is the i3-14100F than the Ryzen 9 3900X?
Roughly 17% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which processor is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the i3-14100F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.