Home / Processors / Compare

i5-11400F vs i5-9600K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-11400F (2021) and the Intel Core i5-9600K (2018).

Winner

i5-11400F

Intel Entry-level

60 / perf index
  • ~15% faster on average
  • Larger L3 cache (12 MB vs 9 MB)
  • Lower power draw (65 W vs 95 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($157 vs $262)
  • Newer (2021 vs 2018)

Check price →

i5-9600K

Intel Entry-level

52 / perf index
  • Higher boost clock (4.6 vs 4.4 GHz)
  • Has integrated graphics

Check price →

Verdict: The i5-11400F is roughly 15% faster than the i5-9600K on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

Note they use different platforms (LGA1200 vs LGA1151), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.

At launch pricing, the i5-11400F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-11400F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-11400F
60
i5-9600K
52

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-11400Fi5-9600K
FamilyRocket LakeCoffee Lake Refresh
SocketLGA1200LGA1151
Release year20212018
Est. gaming perf.
60
52
Est. multi-core perf.
24
17
Est. single-core perf.
62
51
Cores
6
6
Threads
12
6
Max boost clock
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
L3 cache
12 MB
9 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
95 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 630
Launch MSRP
$157
$262

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i5-11400F better than the i5-9600K?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-11400F is about 15% faster than the i5-9600K on average.

How much faster is the i5-11400F than the i5-9600K?

Roughly 15% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-11400F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons