i5-11600K vs i5-12400F
Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-11600K (2021) and the Intel Core i5-12400F (2022).
i5-11600K
Intel Entry-level
- ✓ Higher boost clock (4.9 vs 4.4 GHz)
- ✓ Has integrated graphics
i5-12400F
Intel Mid-range
- ✓ ~11% faster on average
- ✓ Larger L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB)
- ✓ Lower power draw (65 W vs 125 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($167 vs $262)
- ✓ Newer (2022 vs 2021)
Verdict: The i5-12400F is around 11% faster than the i5-11600K on average — a modest edge you may notice in demanding titles, but not a generational leap.
Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs LGA1200), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.
At launch pricing, the i5-12400F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-12400F is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | i5-11600K | i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Rocket Lake | Alder Lake |
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 |
| Release year | 2021 | 2022 |
| Est. gaming perf. | ||
| Est. multi-core perf. | ||
| Est. single-core perf. | ||
| Cores | ||
| Threads | ||
| Max boost clock | ||
| L3 cache | ||
| TDP (base) | ||
| Integrated graphics | UHD 750 | None |
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the i5-12400F better than the i5-11600K?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-12400F is about 11% faster than the i5-11600K on average.
How much faster is the i5-12400F than the i5-11600K?
Roughly 11% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which processor is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the i5-12400F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.