Home / Processors / Compare

i5-12400F vs i5-13600K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-12400F (2022) and the Intel Core i5-13600K (2022).

i5-12400F

Intel Mid-range

70 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (65 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($167 vs $319)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i5-13600K

Intel High-end

81 / perf index
  • ~16% faster on average
  • More cores (14 vs 6)
  • Larger L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.1 vs 4.4 GHz)
  • Has integrated graphics

Check price →

Verdict: The i5-13600K is roughly 16% faster than the i5-12400F on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

At launch pricing, the i5-12400F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-12400F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-12400F
70
i5-13600K
81

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-12400Fi5-13600K
FamilyAlder LakeRaptor Lake
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Release year20222022
Est. gaming perf.
70
81
Est. multi-core perf.
28
56
Est. single-core perf.
72
83
Cores
6
14
Threads
12
20
Max boost clock
4.4 GHz
5.1 GHz
L3 cache
18 MB
24 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 770
Launch MSRP
$167
$319

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i5-13600K better than the i5-12400F?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-13600K is about 16% faster than the i5-12400F on average.

How much faster is the i5-13600K than the i5-12400F?

Roughly 16% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-12400F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons