Home / Processors / Compare

i5-13400F vs i5-13600K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-13400F (2023) and the Intel Core i5-13600K (2022).

i5-13400F

Intel Mid-range

73 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (65 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($196 vs $319)
  • Newer (2023 vs 2022)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i5-13600K

Intel High-end

81 / perf index
  • ~11% faster on average
  • More cores (14 vs 10)
  • Larger L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.1 vs 4.6 GHz)
  • Has integrated graphics

Check price →

Verdict: The i5-13600K is around 11% faster than the i5-13400F on average — a modest edge you may notice in demanding titles, but not a generational leap.

At launch pricing, the i5-13400F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-13400F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-13400F
73
i5-13600K
81

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-13400Fi5-13600K
FamilyRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Release year20232022
Est. gaming perf.
73
81
Est. multi-core perf.
35
56
Est. single-core perf.
74
83
Cores
10
14
Threads
16
20
Max boost clock
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz
L3 cache
20 MB
24 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 770
Launch MSRP
$196
$319

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i5-13600K better than the i5-13400F?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-13600K is about 11% faster than the i5-13400F on average.

How much faster is the i5-13600K than the i5-13400F?

Roughly 11% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-13400F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons