Home / Processors / Compare

i5-13400F vs i5-14600K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-13400F (2023) and the Intel Core i5-14600K (2023).

i5-13400F

Intel Mid-range

73 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (65 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($196 vs $319)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i5-14600K

Intel High-end

83 / perf index
  • ~14% faster on average
  • More cores (14 vs 10)
  • Larger L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.3 vs 4.6 GHz)
  • Has integrated graphics

Check price →

Verdict: The i5-14600K is roughly 14% faster than the i5-13400F on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

At launch pricing, the i5-13400F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-13400F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-13400F
73
i5-14600K
83

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-13400Fi5-14600K
FamilyRaptor LakeRaptor Lake Refresh
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Release year20232023
Est. gaming perf.
73
83
Est. multi-core perf.
35
57
Est. single-core perf.
74
87
Cores
10
14
Threads
16
20
Max boost clock
4.6 GHz
5.3 GHz
L3 cache
20 MB
24 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 770
Launch MSRP
$196
$319

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i5-14600K better than the i5-13400F?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-14600K is about 14% faster than the i5-13400F on average.

How much faster is the i5-14600K than the i5-13400F?

Roughly 14% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-13400F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons