Home / Processors / Compare

i5-13400F vs i5-8400

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-13400F (2023) and the Intel Core i5-8400 (2017).

Winner

i5-13400F

Intel Mid-range

73 / perf index
  • ~55% faster on average
  • More cores (10 vs 6)
  • Larger L3 cache (20 MB vs 9 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (4.6 vs 4.0 GHz)
  • Newer (2023 vs 2017)

Check price →

i5-8400

Intel Entry-level

47 / perf index
  • Has integrated graphics
  • Cheaper at launch ($182 vs $196)

Check price →

Verdict: The i5-13400F is roughly 55% faster than the i5-8400 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs LGA1151), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.

At launch pricing, the i5-13400F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-13400F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-13400F
73
i5-8400
47

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-13400Fi5-8400
FamilyRaptor LakeCoffee Lake
SocketLGA1700LGA1151
Release year20232017
Est. gaming perf.
73
47
Est. multi-core perf.
35
14
Est. single-core perf.
74
45
Cores
10
6
Threads
16
6
Max boost clock
4.6 GHz
4.0 GHz
L3 cache
20 MB
9 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
65 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 630
Launch MSRP
$196
$182

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i5-13400F better than the i5-8400?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-13400F is about 55% faster than the i5-8400 on average.

How much faster is the i5-13400F than the i5-8400?

Roughly 55% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-13400F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons