Home / Processors / Compare

i5-14400 vs i9-10900K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-14400 (2024) and the Intel Core i9-10900K (2020).

Winner

i5-14400

Intel Mid-range

75 / perf index
  • ~21% faster on average
  • Lower power draw (65 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($221 vs $488)
  • Newer (2024 vs 2020)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

i9-10900K

Intel Entry-level

62 / perf index
  • Higher boost clock (5.3 vs 4.7 GHz)

Check price →

Verdict: The i5-14400 is roughly 21% faster than the i9-10900K on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs LGA1200), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.

At launch pricing, the i5-14400 offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-14400 is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-14400
75
i9-10900K
62

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-14400i9-10900K
FamilyRaptor Lake RefreshComet Lake
SocketLGA1700LGA1200
Release year20242020
Est. gaming perf.
75
62
Est. multi-core perf.
36
34
Est. single-core perf.
77
60
Cores
10
10
Threads
16
20
Max boost clock
4.7 GHz
5.3 GHz
L3 cache
20 MB
20 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsUHD 730UHD 630
Launch MSRP
$221
$488

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i5-14400 better than the i9-10900K?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-14400 is about 21% faster than the i9-10900K on average.

How much faster is the i5-14400 than the i9-10900K?

Roughly 21% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-14400 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons