Home / Processors / Compare

i5-14400 vs i9-12900K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-14400 (2024) and the Intel Core i9-12900K (2021).

i5-14400

Intel Mid-range

75 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (65 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($221 vs $589)
  • Newer (2024 vs 2021)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i9-12900K

Intel Mid-range

78 / perf index
  • ~4% faster on average
  • More cores (16 vs 10)
  • Larger L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.2 vs 4.7 GHz)

Check price →

Verdict: The i9-12900K is around 4% faster than the i5-14400 on average — a modest edge you may notice in demanding titles, but not a generational leap.

At launch pricing, the i5-14400 offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-14400 is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-14400
75
i9-12900K
78

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-14400i9-12900K
FamilyRaptor Lake RefreshAlder Lake
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Release year20242021
Est. gaming perf.
75
78
Est. multi-core perf.
36
63
Est. single-core perf.
77
85
Cores
10
16
Threads
16
24
Max boost clock
4.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
L3 cache
20 MB
30 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsUHD 730UHD 770
Launch MSRP
$221
$589

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i9-12900K better than the i5-14400?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i9-12900K is about 4% faster than the i5-14400 on average.

How much faster is the i9-12900K than the i5-14400?

Roughly 4% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-14400 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons