Home / Processors / Compare

i5-8400 vs i9-12900K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-8400 (2017) and the Intel Core i9-12900K (2021).

i5-8400

Intel Entry-level

47 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (65 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($182 vs $589)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i9-12900K

Intel Mid-range

78 / perf index
  • ~66% faster on average
  • More cores (16 vs 6)
  • Larger L3 cache (30 MB vs 9 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.2 vs 4.0 GHz)
  • Newer (2021 vs 2017)

Check price →

Verdict: The i9-12900K is roughly 66% faster than the i5-8400 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs LGA1151), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.

At launch pricing, the i5-8400 offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-8400 is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-8400
47
i9-12900K
78

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-8400i9-12900K
FamilyCoffee LakeAlder Lake
SocketLGA1151LGA1700
Release year20172021
Est. gaming perf.
47
78
Est. multi-core perf.
14
63
Est. single-core perf.
45
85
Cores
6
16
Threads
6
24
Max boost clock
4.0 GHz
5.2 GHz
L3 cache
9 MB
30 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsUHD 630UHD 770
Launch MSRP
$182
$589

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i9-12900K better than the i5-8400?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i9-12900K is about 66% faster than the i5-8400 on average.

How much faster is the i9-12900K than the i5-8400?

Roughly 66% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-8400 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons