Home / Processors / Compare

i5-8400 vs i9-13900K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-8400 (2017) and the Intel Core i9-13900K (2022).

i5-8400

Intel Entry-level

47 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (65 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($182 vs $589)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i9-13900K

Intel Enthusiast

86 / perf index
  • ~83% faster on average
  • More cores (24 vs 6)
  • Larger L3 cache (36 MB vs 9 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.8 vs 4.0 GHz)
  • Newer (2022 vs 2017)

Check price →

Verdict: The i9-13900K is roughly 83% faster than the i5-8400 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs LGA1151), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.

At launch pricing, the i5-8400 offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-8400 is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-8400
47
i9-13900K
86

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-8400i9-13900K
FamilyCoffee LakeRaptor Lake
SocketLGA1151LGA1700
Release year20172022
Est. gaming perf.
47
86
Est. multi-core perf.
14
93
Est. single-core perf.
45
96
Cores
6
24
Threads
6
32
Max boost clock
4.0 GHz
5.8 GHz
L3 cache
9 MB
36 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsUHD 630UHD 770
Launch MSRP
$182
$589

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i9-13900K better than the i5-8400?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i9-13900K is about 83% faster than the i5-8400 on average.

How much faster is the i9-13900K than the i5-8400?

Roughly 83% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-8400 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons