Home / Processors / Compare

i5-8400 vs i9-9900K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-8400 (2017) and the Intel Core i9-9900K (2018).

i5-8400

Intel Entry-level

47 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (65 W vs 95 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($182 vs $488)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i9-9900K

Intel Entry-level

58 / perf index
  • ~23% faster on average
  • More cores (8 vs 6)
  • Larger L3 cache (16 MB vs 9 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.0 vs 4.0 GHz)
  • Newer (2018 vs 2017)

Check price →

Verdict: The i9-9900K is roughly 23% faster than the i5-8400 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

At launch pricing, the i5-8400 offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-8400 is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-8400
47
i9-9900K
58

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-8400i9-9900K
FamilyCoffee LakeCoffee Lake Refresh
SocketLGA1151LGA1151
Release year20172018
Est. gaming perf.
47
58
Est. multi-core perf.
14
28
Est. single-core perf.
45
55
Cores
6
8
Threads
6
16
Max boost clock
4.0 GHz
5.0 GHz
L3 cache
9 MB
16 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
95 W
Integrated graphicsUHD 630UHD 630
Launch MSRP
$182
$488

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i9-9900K better than the i5-8400?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i9-9900K is about 23% faster than the i5-8400 on average.

How much faster is the i9-9900K than the i5-8400?

Roughly 23% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-8400 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons