Home / Processors / Compare

i9-10900K vs i9-11900K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i9-10900K (2020) and the Intel Core i9-11900K (2021).

i9-10900K

Intel Entry-level

62 / perf index
  • More cores (10 vs 8)
  • Larger L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB)
  • Cheaper at launch ($488 vs $539)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i9-11900K

Intel Entry-level

65 / perf index
  • ~5% faster on average
  • Newer (2021 vs 2020)
  • More power-efficient

Check price →

Verdict: The i9-11900K is around 5% faster than the i9-10900K on average — a modest edge you may notice in demanding titles, but not a generational leap.

At launch pricing, the i9-10900K offers more performance per dollar, and the i9-11900K is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i9-10900K
62
i9-11900K
65

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi9-10900Ki9-11900K
FamilyComet LakeRocket Lake
SocketLGA1200LGA1200
Release year20202021
Est. gaming perf.
62
65
Est. multi-core perf.
34
36
Est. single-core perf.
60
68
Cores
10
8
Threads
20
16
Max boost clock
5.3 GHz
5.3 GHz
L3 cache
20 MB
16 MB
TDP (base)
125 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsUHD 630UHD 750
Launch MSRP
$488
$539

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i9-11900K better than the i9-10900K?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i9-11900K is about 5% faster than the i9-10900K on average.

How much faster is the i9-11900K than the i9-10900K?

Roughly 5% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i9-10900K delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons