Home / Processors / Compare

i9-10900K vs i9-14900K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i9-10900K (2020) and the Intel Core i9-14900K (2023).

i9-10900K

Intel Entry-level

62 / perf index
  • Cheaper at launch ($488 vs $589)

Check price →

Winner

i9-14900K

Intel Enthusiast

88 / perf index
  • ~42% faster on average
  • More cores (24 vs 10)
  • Larger L3 cache (36 MB vs 20 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (6.0 vs 5.3 GHz)
  • Newer (2023 vs 2020)

Check price →

Verdict: The i9-14900K is roughly 42% faster than the i9-10900K on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs LGA1200), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.

At launch pricing, the i9-14900K offers more performance per dollar, and the i9-14900K is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i9-10900K
62
i9-14900K
88

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi9-10900Ki9-14900K
FamilyComet LakeRaptor Lake Refresh
SocketLGA1200LGA1700
Release year20202023
Est. gaming perf.
62
88
Est. multi-core perf.
34
95
Est. single-core perf.
60
98
Cores
10
24
Threads
20
32
Max boost clock
5.3 GHz
6.0 GHz
L3 cache
20 MB
36 MB
TDP (base)
125 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsUHD 630UHD 770
Launch MSRP
$488
$589

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i9-14900K better than the i9-10900K?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i9-14900K is about 42% faster than the i9-10900K on average.

How much faster is the i9-14900K than the i9-10900K?

Roughly 42% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i9-14900K delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons