Home / Processors / Compare

i9-10900K vs i9-9900K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i9-10900K (2020) and the Intel Core i9-9900K (2018).

Winner

i9-10900K

Intel Entry-level

62 / perf index
  • ~7% faster on average
  • More cores (10 vs 8)
  • Larger L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.3 vs 5.0 GHz)
  • Newer (2020 vs 2018)

Check price →

i9-9900K

Intel Entry-level

58 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (95 W vs 125 W)

Check price →

Verdict: The i9-10900K is around 7% faster than the i9-9900K on average — a modest edge you may notice in demanding titles, but not a generational leap.

Note they use different platforms (LGA1200 vs LGA1151), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.

At launch pricing, the i9-10900K offers more performance per dollar, and the i9-9900K is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i9-10900K
62
i9-9900K
58

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi9-10900Ki9-9900K
FamilyComet LakeCoffee Lake Refresh
SocketLGA1200LGA1151
Release year20202018
Est. gaming perf.
62
58
Est. multi-core perf.
34
28
Est. single-core perf.
60
55
Cores
10
8
Threads
20
16
Max boost clock
5.3 GHz
5.0 GHz
L3 cache
20 MB
16 MB
TDP (base)
125 W
95 W
Integrated graphicsUHD 630UHD 630
Launch MSRP
$488
$488

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i9-10900K better than the i9-9900K?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i9-10900K is about 7% faster than the i9-9900K on average.

How much faster is the i9-10900K than the i9-9900K?

Roughly 7% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i9-10900K delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons