Home / Processors / Compare

i9-14900K vs i9-9900K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i9-14900K (2023) and the Intel Core i9-9900K (2018).

Winner

i9-14900K

Intel Enthusiast

88 / perf index
  • ~52% faster on average
  • More cores (24 vs 8)
  • Larger L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (6.0 vs 5.0 GHz)
  • Newer (2023 vs 2018)

Check price →

i9-9900K

Intel Entry-level

58 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (95 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($488 vs $589)

Check price →

Verdict: The i9-14900K is roughly 52% faster than the i9-9900K on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs LGA1151), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.

At launch pricing, the i9-14900K offers more performance per dollar, and the i9-14900K is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i9-14900K
88
i9-9900K
58

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi9-14900Ki9-9900K
FamilyRaptor Lake RefreshCoffee Lake Refresh
SocketLGA1700LGA1151
Release year20232018
Est. gaming perf.
88
58
Est. multi-core perf.
95
28
Est. single-core perf.
98
55
Cores
24
8
Threads
32
16
Max boost clock
6.0 GHz
5.0 GHz
L3 cache
36 MB
16 MB
TDP (base)
125 W
95 W
Integrated graphicsUHD 770UHD 630
Launch MSRP
$589
$488

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i9-14900K better than the i9-9900K?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i9-14900K is about 52% faster than the i9-9900K on average.

How much faster is the i9-14900K than the i9-9900K?

Roughly 52% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i9-14900K delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons