Ultra 7 265K vs Ryzen 7 8700G
Full specification comparison between the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K (2024) and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (2024).
Ultra 7 265K
Intel High-end
- ✓ ~8% faster on average
- ✓ More cores (20 vs 8)
- ✓ Larger L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB)
- ✓ Higher boost clock (5.5 vs 5.1 GHz)
Ryzen 7 8700G
AMD Mid-range
- ✓ Lower power draw (65 W vs 125 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($329 vs $394)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
Verdict: The Ultra 7 265K is around 8% faster than the Ryzen 7 8700G on average — a modest edge you may notice in demanding titles, but not a generational leap.
Note they use different platforms (LGA1851 vs AM5), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.
At launch pricing, the Ryzen 7 8700G offers more performance per dollar, and the Ryzen 7 8700G is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen 7 8700G |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Arrow Lake | Zen 4 (APU) |
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM5 |
| Release year | 2024 | 2024 |
| Est. gaming perf. | ||
| Est. multi-core perf. | ||
| Est. single-core perf. | ||
| Cores | ||
| Threads | ||
| Max boost clock | ||
| L3 cache | ||
| TDP (base) | ||
| Integrated graphics | Intel Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ultra 7 265K better than the Ryzen 7 8700G?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the Ultra 7 265K is about 8% faster than the Ryzen 7 8700G on average.
How much faster is the Ultra 7 265K than the Ryzen 7 8700G?
Roughly 8% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which processor is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the Ryzen 7 8700G delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.