Arc A750 vs GTX 1660
Full specification comparison between the Intel Arc A750 (2022) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (2019).
Arc A750
Intel Entry-level
- ✓ ~93% faster on average
- ✓ More VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB)
- ✓ Wider memory bus (256-bit vs 192-bit)
- ✓ Newer (2022 vs 2019)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
GTX 1660
NVIDIA Entry-level
- ✓ Lower power draw (120 W vs 225 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($219 vs $289)
Verdict: The Arc A750 is roughly 93% faster than the GTX 1660 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
The Arc A750 also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 6 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.
At launch pricing, the Arc A750 offers more performance per dollar, and the Arc A750 is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | Arc A750 | GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | Turing |
| Release year | 2022 | 2019 |
| Est. performance | ||
| Shading units | ||
| Boost clock | ||
| FP32 compute | ||
| VRAM | ||
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus | ||
| Board power | ||
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A750 better than the GTX 1660?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the Arc A750 is about 93% faster than the GTX 1660 on average.
How much faster is the Arc A750 than the GTX 1660?
Roughly 93% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which graphics card is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the Arc A750 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.