Home / Graphics Cards / Compare

Arc A750 vs RX 5600 XT

Full specification comparison between the Intel Arc A750 (2022) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (2020).

Winner

Arc A750

Intel Entry-level

27 / perf index
  • ~50% faster on average
  • More VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB)
  • Wider memory bus (256-bit vs 192-bit)
  • Newer (2022 vs 2020)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

RX 5600 XT

AMD Entry-level

18 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (150 W vs 225 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($279 vs $289)

Check price →

Verdict: The Arc A750 is roughly 50% faster than the RX 5600 XT on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

The Arc A750 also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 6 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.

At launch pricing, the Arc A750 offers more performance per dollar, and the Arc A750 is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

Arc A750
27
RX 5600 XT
18

Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

SpecificationArc A750RX 5600 XT
ArchitectureAlchemistRDNA
Release year20222020
Est. performance
27
18
Shading units
3,584
2,304
Boost clock
2050 MHz
1560 MHz
FP32 compute
14.7 TFLOPS
7.2 TFLOPS
VRAM
8 GB
6 GB
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus
256-bit
192-bit
Board power
225 W
150 W
Launch MSRP
$289
$279

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A750 better than the RX 5600 XT?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the Arc A750 is about 50% faster than the RX 5600 XT on average.

How much faster is the Arc A750 than the RX 5600 XT?

Roughly 50% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which graphics card is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the Arc A750 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons