Home / Graphics Cards / Compare

Arc A750 vs RX 6500 XT

Full specification comparison between the Intel Arc A750 (2022) and the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT (2022).

Winner

Arc A750

Intel Entry-level

27 / perf index
  • ~108% faster on average
  • More VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB)
  • Wider memory bus (256-bit vs 64-bit)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

RX 6500 XT

AMD Entry-level

13 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (107 W vs 225 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($199 vs $289)

Check price →

Verdict: The Arc A750 is roughly 108% faster than the RX 6500 XT on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

The Arc A750 also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 4 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.

At launch pricing, the Arc A750 offers more performance per dollar, and the RX 6500 XT is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

Arc A750
27
RX 6500 XT
13

Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

SpecificationArc A750RX 6500 XT
ArchitectureAlchemistRDNA 2
Release year20222022
Est. performance
27
13
Shading units
3,584
1,024
Boost clock
2050 MHz
2815 MHz
FP32 compute
14.7 TFLOPS
5.8 TFLOPS
VRAM
8 GB
4 GB
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus
256-bit
64-bit
Board power
225 W
107 W
Launch MSRP
$289
$199

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A750 better than the RX 6500 XT?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the Arc A750 is about 108% faster than the RX 6500 XT on average.

How much faster is the Arc A750 than the RX 6500 XT?

Roughly 108% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which graphics card is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the Arc A750 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons