Arc A750 vs RX 6800
Full specification comparison between the Intel Arc A750 (2022) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (2020).
Arc A750
Intel Entry-level
- ✓ Lower power draw (225 W vs 250 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($289 vs $579)
- ✓ Newer (2022 vs 2020)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
RX 6800
AMD High-end
- ✓ ~70% faster on average
- ✓ More VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB)
- ✓ More power-efficient
Verdict: The RX 6800 is roughly 70% faster than the Arc A750 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
The RX 6800 also carries more video memory (16 GB vs 8 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.
At launch pricing, the Arc A750 offers more performance per dollar, and the RX 6800 is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | Arc A750 | RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | RDNA 2 |
| Release year | 2022 | 2020 |
| Est. performance | ||
| Shading units | ||
| Boost clock | ||
| FP32 compute | ||
| VRAM | ||
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | ||
| Board power | ||
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX 6800 better than the Arc A750?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 6800 is about 70% faster than the Arc A750 on average.
How much faster is the RX 6800 than the Arc A750?
Roughly 70% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which graphics card is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the Arc A750 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.