Home / Graphics Cards / Compare

Arc A750 vs RX 6900 XT

Full specification comparison between the Intel Arc A750 (2022) and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (2020).

Arc A750

Intel Entry-level

27 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (225 W vs 300 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($289 vs $999)
  • Newer (2022 vs 2020)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

RX 6900 XT

AMD High-end

56 / perf index
  • ~107% faster on average
  • More VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB)
  • More power-efficient

Check price →

Verdict: The RX 6900 XT is roughly 107% faster than the Arc A750 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

The RX 6900 XT also carries more video memory (16 GB vs 8 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.

At launch pricing, the Arc A750 offers more performance per dollar, and the RX 6900 XT is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

Arc A750
27
RX 6900 XT
56

Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

SpecificationArc A750RX 6900 XT
ArchitectureAlchemistRDNA 2
Release year20222020
Est. performance
27
56
Shading units
3,584
5,120
Boost clock
2050 MHz
2250 MHz
FP32 compute
14.7 TFLOPS
23 TFLOPS
VRAM
8 GB
16 GB
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus
256-bit
256-bit
Board power
225 W
300 W
Launch MSRP
$289
$999

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX 6900 XT better than the Arc A750?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 6900 XT is about 107% faster than the Arc A750 on average.

How much faster is the RX 6900 XT than the Arc A750?

Roughly 107% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which graphics card is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the Arc A750 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons