Home / Graphics Cards / Compare

GTX 1660 Ti vs RX 5700

Full specification comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (2019) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (2019).

GTX 1660 Ti

NVIDIA Entry-level

16 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (120 W vs 180 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($279 vs $349)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

RX 5700

AMD Entry-level

20 / perf index
  • ~25% faster on average
  • More VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB)
  • Wider memory bus (256-bit vs 192-bit)

Check price →

Verdict: The RX 5700 is roughly 25% faster than the GTX 1660 Ti on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

The RX 5700 also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 6 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.

At launch pricing, the GTX 1660 Ti offers more performance per dollar, and the GTX 1660 Ti is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

GTX 1660 Ti
16
RX 5700
20

Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

SpecificationGTX 1660 TiRX 5700
ArchitectureTuringRDNA
Release year20192019
Est. performance
16
20
Shading units
1,536
2,304
Boost clock
1770 MHz
1725 MHz
FP32 compute
5.4 TFLOPS
7.9 TFLOPS
VRAM
6 GB
8 GB
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus
192-bit
256-bit
Board power
120 W
180 W
Launch MSRP
$279
$349

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX 5700 better than the GTX 1660 Ti?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 5700 is about 25% faster than the GTX 1660 Ti on average.

How much faster is the RX 5700 than the GTX 1660 Ti?

Roughly 25% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which graphics card is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the GTX 1660 Ti delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons