GTX 1660 vs RX 5700
Full specification comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (2019) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (2019).
GTX 1660
NVIDIA Entry-level
- ✓ Lower power draw (120 W vs 180 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($219 vs $349)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
RX 5700
AMD Entry-level
- ✓ ~43% faster on average
- ✓ More VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB)
- ✓ Wider memory bus (256-bit vs 192-bit)
Verdict: The RX 5700 is roughly 43% faster than the GTX 1660 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
The RX 5700 also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 6 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.
At launch pricing, the GTX 1660 offers more performance per dollar, and the GTX 1660 is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | GTX 1660 | RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
| Release year | 2019 | 2019 |
| Est. performance | ||
| Shading units | ||
| Boost clock | ||
| FP32 compute | ||
| VRAM | ||
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | ||
| Board power | ||
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX 5700 better than the GTX 1660?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 5700 is about 43% faster than the GTX 1660 on average.
How much faster is the RX 5700 than the GTX 1660?
Roughly 43% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which graphics card is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the GTX 1660 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.