RTX 3050 vs RX 6900 XT
Full specification comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 (2022) and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (2020).
RTX 3050
NVIDIA Entry-level
- ✓ Lower power draw (130 W vs 300 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($249 vs $999)
- ✓ Newer (2022 vs 2020)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
RX 6900 XT
AMD High-end
- ✓ ~211% faster on average
- ✓ More VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB)
- ✓ Wider memory bus (256-bit vs 128-bit)
- ✓ More power-efficient
Verdict: The RX 6900 XT is roughly 211% faster than the RTX 3050 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
The RX 6900 XT also carries more video memory (16 GB vs 8 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.
At launch pricing, the RTX 3050 offers more performance per dollar, and the RX 6900 XT is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | RTX 3050 | RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2 |
| Release year | 2022 | 2020 |
| Est. performance | ||
| Shading units | ||
| Boost clock | ||
| FP32 compute | ||
| VRAM | ||
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | ||
| Board power | ||
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX 6900 XT better than the RTX 3050?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 6900 XT is about 211% faster than the RTX 3050 on average.
How much faster is the RX 6900 XT than the RTX 3050?
Roughly 211% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which graphics card is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the RTX 3050 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.