Home / Processors / Compare

i3-10100 vs i5-12400F

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i3-10100 (2020) and the Intel Core i5-12400F (2022).

i3-10100

Intel Entry-level

50 / perf index
  • Has integrated graphics
  • Cheaper at launch ($122 vs $167)

Check price →

Winner

i5-12400F

Intel Mid-range

70 / perf index
  • ~40% faster on average
  • More cores (6 vs 4)
  • Larger L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (4.4 vs 4.3 GHz)
  • Newer (2022 vs 2020)

Check price →

Verdict: The i5-12400F is roughly 40% faster than the i3-10100 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs LGA1200), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.

At launch pricing, the i5-12400F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-12400F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i3-10100
50
i5-12400F
70

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi3-10100i5-12400F
FamilyComet LakeAlder Lake
SocketLGA1200LGA1700
Release year20202022
Est. gaming perf.
50
70
Est. multi-core perf.
14
28
Est. single-core perf.
49
72
Cores
4
6
Threads
8
12
Max boost clock
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
L3 cache
6 MB
18 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
65 W
Integrated graphicsUHD 630None
Launch MSRP
$122
$167

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i5-12400F better than the i3-10100?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-12400F is about 40% faster than the i3-10100 on average.

How much faster is the i5-12400F than the i3-10100?

Roughly 40% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-12400F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons