Home / Processors / Compare

i5-10400F vs i5-11600K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-10400F (2020) and the Intel Core i5-11600K (2021).

i5-10400F

Intel Entry-level

56 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (65 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($157 vs $262)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i5-11600K

Intel Entry-level

63 / perf index
  • ~13% faster on average
  • Higher boost clock (4.9 vs 4.3 GHz)
  • Has integrated graphics
  • Newer (2021 vs 2020)

Check price →

Verdict: The i5-11600K is roughly 13% faster than the i5-10400F on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

At launch pricing, the i5-10400F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-10400F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-10400F
56
i5-11600K
63

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-10400Fi5-11600K
FamilyComet LakeRocket Lake
SocketLGA1200LGA1200
Release year20202021
Est. gaming perf.
56
63
Est. multi-core perf.
20
27
Est. single-core perf.
51
66
Cores
6
6
Threads
12
12
Max boost clock
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
L3 cache
12 MB
12 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 750
Launch MSRP
$157
$262

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i5-11600K better than the i5-10400F?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-11600K is about 13% faster than the i5-10400F on average.

How much faster is the i5-11600K than the i5-10400F?

Roughly 13% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-10400F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons