Home / Processors / Compare

i5-10400F vs i7-10700K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-10400F (2020) and the Intel Core i7-10700K (2020).

i5-10400F

Intel Entry-level

56 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (65 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($157 vs $374)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i7-10700K

Intel Entry-level

60 / perf index
  • ~7% faster on average
  • More cores (8 vs 6)
  • Larger L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.1 vs 4.3 GHz)
  • Has integrated graphics

Check price →

Verdict: The i7-10700K is around 7% faster than the i5-10400F on average — a modest edge you may notice in demanding titles, but not a generational leap.

At launch pricing, the i5-10400F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-10400F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-10400F
56
i7-10700K
60

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-10400Fi7-10700K
FamilyComet LakeComet Lake
SocketLGA1200LGA1200
Release year20202020
Est. gaming perf.
56
60
Est. multi-core perf.
20
28
Est. single-core perf.
51
57
Cores
6
8
Threads
12
16
Max boost clock
4.3 GHz
5.1 GHz
L3 cache
12 MB
16 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 630
Launch MSRP
$157
$374

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i7-10700K better than the i5-10400F?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i7-10700K is about 7% faster than the i5-10400F on average.

How much faster is the i7-10700K than the i5-10400F?

Roughly 7% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-10400F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons