i5-10400F vs i9-14900K
Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-10400F (2020) and the Intel Core i9-14900K (2023).
i5-10400F
Intel Entry-level
- ✓ Lower power draw (65 W vs 125 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($157 vs $589)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
i9-14900K
Intel Enthusiast
- ✓ ~57% faster on average
- ✓ More cores (24 vs 6)
- ✓ Larger L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB)
- ✓ Higher boost clock (6.0 vs 4.3 GHz)
- ✓ Has integrated graphics
Verdict: The i9-14900K is roughly 57% faster than the i5-10400F on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs LGA1200), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.
At launch pricing, the i5-10400F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-10400F is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | i5-10400F | i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Comet Lake | Raptor Lake Refresh |
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 |
| Release year | 2020 | 2023 |
| Est. gaming perf. | ||
| Est. multi-core perf. | ||
| Est. single-core perf. | ||
| Cores | ||
| Threads | ||
| Max boost clock | ||
| L3 cache | ||
| TDP (base) | ||
| Integrated graphics | None | UHD 770 |
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the i9-14900K better than the i5-10400F?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i9-14900K is about 57% faster than the i5-10400F on average.
How much faster is the i9-14900K than the i5-10400F?
Roughly 57% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which processor is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the i5-10400F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.