i5-12400F vs i7-9700K
Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-12400F (2022) and the Intel Core i7-9700K (2018).
i5-12400F
Intel Mid-range
- ✓ ~25% faster on average
- ✓ Larger L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB)
- ✓ Lower power draw (65 W vs 95 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($167 vs $374)
- ✓ Newer (2022 vs 2018)
i7-9700K
Intel Entry-level
- ✓ More cores (8 vs 6)
- ✓ Higher boost clock (4.9 vs 4.4 GHz)
- ✓ Has integrated graphics
Verdict: The i5-12400F is roughly 25% faster than the i7-9700K on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs LGA1151), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.
At launch pricing, the i5-12400F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-12400F is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | i5-12400F | i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Alder Lake | Coffee Lake Refresh |
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1151 |
| Release year | 2022 | 2018 |
| Est. gaming perf. | ||
| Est. multi-core perf. | ||
| Est. single-core perf. | ||
| Cores | ||
| Threads | ||
| Max boost clock | ||
| L3 cache | ||
| TDP (base) | ||
| Integrated graphics | None | UHD 630 |
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the i5-12400F better than the i7-9700K?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-12400F is about 25% faster than the i7-9700K on average.
How much faster is the i5-12400F than the i7-9700K?
Roughly 25% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which processor is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the i5-12400F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.