Home / Processors / Compare

i5-9400F vs i7-8700K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i5-9400F (2019) and the Intel Core i7-8700K (2017).

i5-9400F

Intel Entry-level

50 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (65 W vs 95 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($182 vs $359)
  • Newer (2019 vs 2017)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

i7-8700K

Intel Entry-level

52 / perf index
  • ~4% faster on average
  • Larger L3 cache (12 MB vs 9 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (4.7 vs 4.1 GHz)
  • Has integrated graphics

Check price →

Verdict: The i7-8700K is around 4% faster than the i5-9400F on average — a modest edge you may notice in demanding titles, but not a generational leap.

At launch pricing, the i5-9400F offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-9400F is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i5-9400F
50
i7-8700K
52

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi5-9400Fi7-8700K
FamilyCoffee Lake RefreshCoffee Lake
SocketLGA1151LGA1151
Release year20192017
Est. gaming perf.
50
52
Est. multi-core perf.
15
21
Est. single-core perf.
47
51
Cores
6
6
Threads
6
12
Max boost clock
4.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
L3 cache
9 MB
12 MB
TDP (base)
65 W
95 W
Integrated graphicsNoneUHD 630
Launch MSRP
$182
$359

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the i7-8700K better than the i5-9400F?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i7-8700K is about 4% faster than the i5-9400F on average.

How much faster is the i7-8700K than the i5-9400F?

Roughly 4% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the i5-9400F delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons