i9-14900K vs Ultra 9 285K
Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i9-14900K (2023) and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (2024).
i9-14900K
Intel Enthusiast
- ✓ ~5% faster on average
- ✓ Higher boost clock (6.0 vs 5.7 GHz)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
- ✓ More power-efficient
Verdict: The i9-14900K is around 5% faster than the Ultra 9 285K on average — a modest edge you may notice in demanding titles, but not a generational leap.
For gaming the i9-14900K leads, but the Ultra 9 285K pulls ahead in heavily multi-threaded work like rendering, compiling and video export thanks to its stronger multi-core throughput.
Note they use different platforms (LGA1700 vs LGA1851), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.
At launch pricing, the i9-14900K offers more performance per dollar, and the i9-14900K is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | i9-14900K | Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Raptor Lake Refresh | Arrow Lake |
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| Release year | 2023 | 2024 |
| Est. gaming perf. | ||
| Est. multi-core perf. | ||
| Est. single-core perf. | ||
| Cores | ||
| Threads | ||
| Max boost clock | ||
| L3 cache | ||
| TDP (base) | ||
| Integrated graphics | UHD 770 | Intel Graphics |
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the i9-14900K better than the Ultra 9 285K?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i9-14900K is about 5% faster than the Ultra 9 285K on average.
How much faster is the i9-14900K than the Ultra 9 285K?
Roughly 5% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which processor is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the i9-14900K delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.