Home / Processors / Compare

i9-9900K vs Ultra 9 285K

Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i9-9900K (2018) and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (2024).

i9-9900K

Intel Entry-level

58 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (95 W vs 125 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($488 vs $589)

Check price →

Winner

Ultra 9 285K

Intel High-end

84 / perf index
  • ~45% faster on average
  • More cores (24 vs 8)
  • Larger L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB)
  • Higher boost clock (5.7 vs 5.0 GHz)
  • Newer (2024 vs 2018)

Check price →

Verdict: The Ultra 9 285K is roughly 45% faster than the i9-9900K on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

Note they use different platforms (LGA1851 vs LGA1151), so this is a motherboard decision too, not just a CPU swap.

At launch pricing, the Ultra 9 285K offers more performance per dollar, and the Ultra 9 285K is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

i9-9900K
58
Ultra 9 285K
84

Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

Specificationi9-9900KUltra 9 285K
FamilyCoffee Lake RefreshArrow Lake
SocketLGA1151LGA1851
Release year20182024
Est. gaming perf.
58
84
Est. multi-core perf.
28
98
Est. single-core perf.
55
100
Cores
8
24
Threads
16
24
Max boost clock
5.0 GHz
5.7 GHz
L3 cache
16 MB
36 MB
TDP (base)
95 W
125 W
Integrated graphicsUHD 630Intel Graphics
Launch MSRP
$488
$589

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the Ultra 9 285K better than the i9-9900K?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the Ultra 9 285K is about 45% faster than the i9-9900K on average.

How much faster is the Ultra 9 285K than the i9-9900K?

Roughly 45% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which processor is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the Ultra 9 285K delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons