Home / Graphics Cards / Compare

Arc A380 vs Arc A750

Full specification comparison between the Intel Arc A380 (2022) and the Intel Arc A750 (2022).

Arc A380

Intel Entry-level

8 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (75 W vs 225 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($139 vs $289)

Check price →

Winner

Arc A750

Intel Entry-level

27 / perf index
  • ~238% faster on average
  • More VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB)
  • Wider memory bus (256-bit vs 96-bit)
  • Better performance per dollar
  • More power-efficient

Check price →

Verdict: The Arc A750 is roughly 238% faster than the Arc A380 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

The Arc A750 also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 6 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.

At launch pricing, the Arc A750 offers more performance per dollar, and the Arc A750 is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

Arc A380
8
Arc A750
27

Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

SpecificationArc A380Arc A750
ArchitectureAlchemistAlchemist
Release year20222022
Est. performance
8
27
Shading units
1,024
3,584
Boost clock
2000 MHz
2050 MHz
FP32 compute
4.1 TFLOPS
14.7 TFLOPS
VRAM
6 GB
8 GB
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus
96-bit
256-bit
Board power
75 W
225 W
Launch MSRP
$139
$289

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A750 better than the Arc A380?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the Arc A750 is about 238% faster than the Arc A380 on average.

How much faster is the Arc A750 than the Arc A380?

Roughly 238% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which graphics card is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the Arc A750 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons