Arc A380 vs GTX 1650
Full specification comparison between the Intel Arc A380 (2022) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (2019).
Arc A380
Intel Entry-level
- ✓ More VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($139 vs $149)
- ✓ Newer (2022 vs 2019)
GTX 1650
NVIDIA Entry-level
- ✓ ~13% faster on average
- ✓ Wider memory bus (128-bit vs 96-bit)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
- ✓ More power-efficient
Verdict: The GTX 1650 is roughly 13% faster than the Arc A380 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
The Arc A380 also carries more video memory (6 GB vs 4 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.
At launch pricing, the GTX 1650 offers more performance per dollar, and the GTX 1650 is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | Arc A380 | GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | Turing |
| Release year | 2022 | 2019 |
| Est. performance | ||
| Shading units | ||
| Boost clock | ||
| FP32 compute | ||
| VRAM | ||
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus | ||
| Board power | ||
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 1650 better than the Arc A380?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the GTX 1650 is about 13% faster than the Arc A380 on average.
How much faster is the GTX 1650 than the Arc A380?
Roughly 13% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which graphics card is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the GTX 1650 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.