GTX 1650 vs GTX 1650 Super
Full specification comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (2019) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (2019).
GTX 1650
NVIDIA Entry-level
- ✓ Lower power draw (75 W vs 100 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($149 vs $159)
GTX 1650 Super
NVIDIA Entry-level
- ✓ ~33% faster on average
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
Verdict: The GTX 1650 Super is roughly 33% faster than the GTX 1650 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
At launch pricing, the GTX 1650 Super offers more performance per dollar, and the GTX 1650 is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | GTX 1650 | GTX 1650 Super |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Release year | 2019 | 2019 |
| Est. performance | ||
| Shading units | ||
| Boost clock | ||
| FP32 compute | ||
| VRAM | ||
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | ||
| Board power | ||
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 1650 Super better than the GTX 1650?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the GTX 1650 Super is about 33% faster than the GTX 1650 on average.
How much faster is the GTX 1650 Super than the GTX 1650?
Roughly 33% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which graphics card is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the GTX 1650 Super delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.