Arc A380 vs RTX 3050
Full specification comparison between the Intel Arc A380 (2022) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 (2022).
Arc A380
Intel Entry-level
- ✓ Lower power draw (75 W vs 130 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($139 vs $249)
RTX 3050
NVIDIA Entry-level
- ✓ ~125% faster on average
- ✓ More VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB)
- ✓ Wider memory bus (128-bit vs 96-bit)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
- ✓ More power-efficient
Verdict: The RTX 3050 is roughly 125% faster than the Arc A380 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
The RTX 3050 also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 6 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.
At launch pricing, the RTX 3050 offers more performance per dollar, and the RTX 3050 is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | Arc A380 | RTX 3050 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | Ampere |
| Release year | 2022 | 2022 |
| Est. performance | ||
| Shading units | ||
| Boost clock | ||
| FP32 compute | ||
| VRAM | ||
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | ||
| Board power | ||
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the RTX 3050 better than the Arc A380?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RTX 3050 is about 125% faster than the Arc A380 on average.
How much faster is the RTX 3050 than the Arc A380?
Roughly 125% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which graphics card is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the RTX 3050 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.