Home / Graphics Cards / Compare

Arc A380 vs RX 5700

Full specification comparison between the Intel Arc A380 (2022) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (2019).

Arc A380

Intel Entry-level

8 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (75 W vs 180 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($139 vs $349)
  • Newer (2022 vs 2019)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

RX 5700

AMD Entry-level

20 / perf index
  • ~150% faster on average
  • More VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB)
  • Wider memory bus (256-bit vs 96-bit)
  • More power-efficient

Check price →

Verdict: The RX 5700 is roughly 150% faster than the Arc A380 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

The RX 5700 also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 6 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.

At launch pricing, the Arc A380 offers more performance per dollar, and the RX 5700 is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

Arc A380
8
RX 5700
20

Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

SpecificationArc A380RX 5700
ArchitectureAlchemistRDNA
Release year20222019
Est. performance
8
20
Shading units
1,024
2,304
Boost clock
2000 MHz
1725 MHz
FP32 compute
4.1 TFLOPS
7.9 TFLOPS
VRAM
6 GB
8 GB
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus
96-bit
256-bit
Board power
75 W
180 W
Launch MSRP
$139
$349

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX 5700 better than the Arc A380?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 5700 is about 150% faster than the Arc A380 on average.

How much faster is the RX 5700 than the Arc A380?

Roughly 150% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which graphics card is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the Arc A380 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons