Arc A380 vs RX 6500 XT
Full specification comparison between the Intel Arc A380 (2022) and the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT (2022).
Arc A380
Intel Entry-level
- ✓ More VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB)
- ✓ Wider memory bus (96-bit vs 64-bit)
- ✓ Lower power draw (75 W vs 107 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($139 vs $199)
RX 6500 XT
AMD Entry-level
- ✓ ~63% faster on average
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
- ✓ More power-efficient
Verdict: The RX 6500 XT is roughly 63% faster than the Arc A380 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
The Arc A380 also carries more video memory (6 GB vs 4 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.
At launch pricing, the RX 6500 XT offers more performance per dollar, and the RX 6500 XT is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | Arc A380 | RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | RDNA 2 |
| Release year | 2022 | 2022 |
| Est. performance | ||
| Shading units | ||
| Boost clock | ||
| FP32 compute | ||
| VRAM | ||
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | ||
| Board power | ||
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX 6500 XT better than the Arc A380?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 6500 XT is about 63% faster than the Arc A380 on average.
How much faster is the RX 6500 XT than the Arc A380?
Roughly 63% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which graphics card is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the RX 6500 XT delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.