Home / Graphics Cards / Compare

GTX 1650 Super vs RX 6600

Full specification comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (2019) and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (2021).

GTX 1650 Super

NVIDIA Entry-level

12 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (100 W vs 132 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($159 vs $329)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

Winner

RX 6600

AMD Entry-level

24 / perf index
  • ~100% faster on average
  • More VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB)
  • Newer (2021 vs 2019)
  • More power-efficient

Check price →

Verdict: The RX 6600 is roughly 100% faster than the GTX 1650 Super on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

The RX 6600 also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 4 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.

At launch pricing, the GTX 1650 Super offers more performance per dollar, and the RX 6600 is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

GTX 1650 Super
12
RX 6600
24

Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

SpecificationGTX 1650 SuperRX 6600
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 2
Release year20192021
Est. performance
12
24
Shading units
1,280
1,792
Boost clock
1725 MHz
2491 MHz
FP32 compute
4.4 TFLOPS
8.9 TFLOPS
VRAM
4 GB
8 GB
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus
128-bit
128-bit
Board power
100 W
132 W
Launch MSRP
$159
$329

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX 6600 better than the GTX 1650 Super?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 6600 is about 100% faster than the GTX 1650 Super on average.

How much faster is the RX 6600 than the GTX 1650 Super?

Roughly 100% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which graphics card is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the GTX 1650 Super delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons