GTX 1650 Super vs RX 6800
Full specification comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (2019) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (2020).
GTX 1650 Super
NVIDIA Entry-level
- ✓ Lower power draw (100 W vs 250 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($159 vs $579)
RX 6800
AMD High-end
- ✓ ~283% faster on average
- ✓ More VRAM (16 GB vs 4 GB)
- ✓ Wider memory bus (256-bit vs 128-bit)
- ✓ Newer (2020 vs 2019)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
Verdict: The RX 6800 is roughly 283% faster than the GTX 1650 Super on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
The RX 6800 also carries more video memory (16 GB vs 4 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.
At launch pricing, the RX 6800 offers more performance per dollar, and the RX 6800 is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | GTX 1650 Super | RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2 |
| Release year | 2019 | 2020 |
| Est. performance | ||
| Shading units | ||
| Boost clock | ||
| FP32 compute | ||
| VRAM | ||
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | ||
| Board power | ||
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX 6800 better than the GTX 1650 Super?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 6800 is about 283% faster than the GTX 1650 Super on average.
How much faster is the RX 6800 than the GTX 1650 Super?
Roughly 283% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which graphics card is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the RX 6800 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.