GTX 1650 Super vs RX 6900 XT
Full specification comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (2019) and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (2020).
GTX 1650 Super
NVIDIA Entry-level
- ✓ Lower power draw (100 W vs 300 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($159 vs $999)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
RX 6900 XT
AMD High-end
- ✓ ~367% faster on average
- ✓ More VRAM (16 GB vs 4 GB)
- ✓ Wider memory bus (256-bit vs 128-bit)
- ✓ Newer (2020 vs 2019)
- ✓ More power-efficient
Verdict: The RX 6900 XT is roughly 367% faster than the GTX 1650 Super on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
The RX 6900 XT also carries more video memory (16 GB vs 4 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.
At launch pricing, the GTX 1650 Super offers more performance per dollar, and the RX 6900 XT is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | GTX 1650 Super | RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2 |
| Release year | 2019 | 2020 |
| Est. performance | ||
| Shading units | ||
| Boost clock | ||
| FP32 compute | ||
| VRAM | ||
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | ||
| Board power | ||
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX 6900 XT better than the GTX 1650 Super?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 6900 XT is about 367% faster than the GTX 1650 Super on average.
How much faster is the RX 6900 XT than the GTX 1650 Super?
Roughly 367% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which graphics card is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the GTX 1650 Super delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.