i3-10100 vs i5-10400F
Full specification comparison between the Intel Core i3-10100 (2020) and the Intel Core i5-10400F (2020).
i3-10100
Intel Entry-level
- ✓ Has integrated graphics
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($122 vs $157)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
i5-10400F
Intel Entry-level
- ✓ ~12% faster on average
- ✓ More cores (6 vs 4)
- ✓ Larger L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB)
- ✓ More power-efficient
Verdict: The i5-10400F is around 12% faster than the i3-10100 on average — a modest edge you may notice in demanding titles, but not a generational leap.
At launch pricing, the i3-10100 offers more performance per dollar, and the i5-10400F is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1080p gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | i3-10100 | i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Comet Lake | Comet Lake |
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1200 |
| Release year | 2020 | 2020 |
| Est. gaming perf. | ||
| Est. multi-core perf. | ||
| Est. single-core perf. | ||
| Cores | ||
| Threads | ||
| Max boost clock | ||
| L3 cache | ||
| TDP (base) | ||
| Integrated graphics | UHD 630 | None |
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the i5-10400F better than the i3-10100?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the i5-10400F is about 12% faster than the i3-10100 on average.
How much faster is the i5-10400F than the i3-10100?
Roughly 12% on average in gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which processor is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the i3-10100 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.