Home / Graphics Cards / Compare

Arc A580 vs GTX 1650

Full specification comparison between the Intel Arc A580 (2023) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (2019).

Winner

Arc A580

Intel Entry-level

24 / perf index
  • ~167% faster on average
  • More VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB)
  • Wider memory bus (256-bit vs 128-bit)
  • Newer (2023 vs 2019)
  • Better performance per dollar

Check price →

GTX 1650

NVIDIA Entry-level

9 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (75 W vs 185 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($149 vs $179)

Check price →

Verdict: The Arc A580 is roughly 167% faster than the GTX 1650 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

The Arc A580 also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 4 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.

At launch pricing, the Arc A580 offers more performance per dollar, and the Arc A580 is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

Arc A580
24
GTX 1650
9

Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

SpecificationArc A580GTX 1650
ArchitectureAlchemistTuring
Release year20232019
Est. performance
24
9
Shading units
3,072
896
Boost clock
1700 MHz
1665 MHz
FP32 compute
10.4 TFLOPS
3 TFLOPS
VRAM
8 GB
4 GB
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus
256-bit
128-bit
Board power
185 W
75 W
Launch MSRP
$179
$149

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A580 better than the GTX 1650?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the Arc A580 is about 167% faster than the GTX 1650 on average.

How much faster is the Arc A580 than the GTX 1650?

Roughly 167% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which graphics card is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the Arc A580 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons